I surprised myself several times on this adventure run, accomplishing
athletic feats, especially in New Hampshire and Maine, that made me fearful,
things I wasn't sure I could do, like going down steep, exposed rock ledges and
slabs, climbing up vertical walls of rock with tiny hand- and foot-holds, and
crossing waist- and chest-high raging creeks and rivers.
Not only do I have a new respect for the Appalachian Trail and those who walk
or run its entire length, I also have the feeling of pride and accomplishment
that I did it, too.
Even though I really wanted to finish the AT, I didn't know if I could do it.
That was part of the allure, the challenge. And I had no clue just how difficult
some of it would be before I began!
It's interesting now to re-read
Prep #5 from February where I assessed my
training for the trek and gave myself decent odds for finishing. By
Prep #16 I
was a little less confident, as the time drew closer to start.
If I'd known more about the Whites and the Mahoosucs at the time, I might not
have even started my adventure for fear I wouldn't be able to finish. Sometimes ignorance is
bliss!
I never thought about quitting. There were several days when I
wanted to be DONE, but that's different. I was as motivated to finish this
journey as anyone who's ever done the AT. Only some sort of emergency would have
prevented it.
GEAR REVIEW
This is the easiest post entry to write, so I'll begin here. Hopefully it
will be of some use to other folks who want to travel "light" on the AT, whether
running or speed-hiking.
I wrote in more detail about the gear I was planning to use in
Prep #10. They
are mostly items I was familiar using in ultras. I used most of them on the
Trail with great success. A few others, like gaiters, I really didn't need.
These are the gear items I found most useful and why:
CAMELBAK H.A.W.G. HYDRATION PACK
Ultra-light back-packers would need a lighter, more roomy pack than this one,
but I found it nearly perfect for my situation. Most importantly, it fit me
well. Others I tried on didn't feel good. The weight didn't concern me because
the pack held what I needed to carry for up to 15 hours on the Trail, the
longest I was out there.
The H.A.W.G. comes with a 100-oz. bladder, which didn't fail me. I used it
daily. There is also room for a second 70- or 100-oz. bladder. On hot summer days I
sometimes carried two. That weighed me down a lot and made running difficult,
but at least I didn't run out of water when I had two bladders. (More on hydration in
Post #2.)
The pack is not waterproof and I was unable to find an extra-small pack cover
along the way. After a short while on the Trail I learned to keep my spare
clothes, light, cell phone, camera and other vulnerable items in plastic zipper-locked bags so they'd stay dry
when it rained or I fell in a creek or bog.
I'm extremely pleased with the durability of this pack. The only tear after
four months on the Trail is to the back netting. That's my fault for scraping it
crawling under and over boulders in the Mahoosuc Notch. I was able to adequately
patch it with needle and thread so it lasted the rest of the trek. Otherwise,
this thing is nearly indestructible.
[Note from 2008: it's still in great
shape after the Colorado Trail and other long runs in 2006 and 2007.]
MONTRAIL HARDROCK AND HIGHLINE SHOES
Yeah, Montrail is one of my two sponsors but I requested a discount from them
because I'd worn about two dozen pairs of their shoes before this adventure run
and I wasn't even considering another brand.
I was delighted to find so many backpackers wearing the Hardrocks, too! More
than half the thru-hikers I saw who made it all or most of the way were wearing trail
shoes - not hiking boots - by New England, despite the rocks. Those who were
wearing trail shoes in Maine were grateful to have footwear that dried out
faster than hiking boots (Maine is very WET).
I quickly discovered the Hardrocks were better for me on the AT than the
Vitesse. I went through about sixteen pairs of Vitesse and only one pair of
Hardrocks before this trek. But the Hardrocks have a more aggressive sole that
helped me grip rocks and mud better than the Vitesse. They were also very
comfortable.
I wore out four pairs of Hardrocks and have many miles on another pair of Hardrocks and one pair of Highlines (same sole) - that's six pairs
of shoes for about
2,200 miles. AT rocks eat up soles! The uppers were fine, even though my shoes
were wet a lot and always dirty. They'd probably last longer on smoother trails
like the PCT.
We had to cut slits in the last three pairs of the Hardrocks when one of my
little toes started to hurt from an infected toenail. Even with cuts in the
uppers, the shoes lasted just fine and didn't tear further. The only problem was
getting more grit and little pebbles in that side when I went through water.
One reason I had very few blister problems (and only in the first few weeks)
was wearing my shoes a half size larger than normal. I wear larger shoes in 50- and
100-milers because my feet swell some during the race.
I used the same logic on
the AT: even though my longest run was "only" 35 miles, I assumed that
running and hiking three times my normal weekly mileage for several months would
cause my feet to stay a bit swollen. Some days they were swollen; most of
the time they weren't. But the shoes were always comfy.
INJINJI TETRA-TSOKS
My second secret weapon in the blister war was toe-socks. I used six pairs of
Injinji's khaki-colored socks the whole way with nary a blister on any of my
separated toes (only on the side of my foot and one big toe where I had
callouses) and nary a hole in my socks.
When I first started using toe-socks several years ago, they wore out fast.
They are expensive, so I complained and received more socks. They wore
out fast, too. Then I read on the ultra running listserve about using regular
thin running socks OVER the toe socks to make them last longer. I tried it in
training and it seemed to work.
I'm here to tell you this system was GREAT for me. I used some inexpensive
Coolmax ankle socks (about $1.50/pair) from Wal-Mart over the Tetra-Tsoks every
day. I got used to them and never noticed that my feet were too hot. The
cheap socks saved the expensive toe-socks and may have also helped prevent
blisters.
If you have problems with blisters and haven't used Injinji's socks, try a
pair. I got mine last December when the company had a special "sale" (buy four
or five and get one free). After the first month on the Trail, I never needed to
use any anti-blister products, even lubricants.
BLIST-O-BAN BANDAGES
When I did have some problems with blisters under calluses the first three
or four weeks on the Trail, I used these thin bandages successfully. They are
about $1.00 per bandage and come in three sizes. The sticky part is very, very
thin. The part that goes over the hot spot or blister is two thin layers with
air between, which pillows the sore spot.
The bandages worked great while they were on. Keeping them on was a problem
because they'd stick to my socks and peel off when I removed my socks. I used Hydropel around the edges to keep them from sticking, but by the end of the day
the lubricant would be worn off and the bandages would usually come off anyway,
either when I took my socks off or when I was in the shower.
Bottom line: Blist-O-Ban bandages work great but are expensive because
you have to keep re-applying them. This wouldn't be a huge problem in an ultra,
but if you need them for thirty days, they get expensive.
www.blistoban.com
This is a photo from north GA on Day 4 (5-3-05):
ASO ANKLE SUPPORTS
These were my secret weapon against ankle sprains. I simply could not have
done the AT without them.
Some folks will say I have further weakened my already-trashed ankles by
depending on ankle supports, but using them was the only way I could have ever
finished the Trail. Now that I'm done, I'll resume my efforts to strengthen my
ankles and be less dependent on the supports.
I started using these supports after ruptured tendon surgery in one ankle
almost four years ago. My orthopedist in Montana recommended them for rough
trail running. I felt so comfortable in the one for my repaired ankle that I
purchased another for the better ankle. My current orthopedist in Roanoke wrote
a prescription for new ones before I embarked on the Trail. They require some
machine-stitching now, but are still in great shape after 2,200 miles.
If you have problems with ankle sprains, try them. You may be able to find
them in a local medical supply store. I couldn't, but a local store ordered them for me.
Or do a search on the internet for "ASO ankle supports" and several medical
supply places will come up. You can see pictures of them and read how they work.
You don't need a prescription to buy them. I used my insurance because it
does cover them - cheaper than surgery, after all!
TREKKING POLES
I used old telescoping REI poles that I've had for several years. There are
several good brands of poles if you need new ones. Most thru-hikers used poles, although some did not.
They are more important for balancing when carrying a large pack than a small
one - or if you're as clumsy and "unbalanced" as me!
(No snickers, please, from those of you who always knew I was
unbalanced!)
I used just one pole the first 60% of the trek. When I had to start fording
more creeks and balancing on bog boards from New Jersey to the end, I started
using two poles more often. Two were crucial in Maine, especially when I had to
ford flooded streams.
I was able to toss them up or down the trail when I was scaling rock ledges
and "verticals" everywhere except two places: in Mahoosuc Notch I had to
telescope them and put them in my pack. Otherwise, they'd have disappeared down
a crevice. And I didn't bother with them on Katahdin because other hikers said
they'd be pretty useless there.
Otherwise, one or two poles can come in mighty handy for various things
besides balancing on rocks and bog boards and through deep streams. They are
great for flicking branches off the Trail, getting cobwebs before they get you,
and defending yourself from any potential predators (fortunately, I didn't need
them for that).
NIKON COOLPIX 4100 DIGITAL CAMERA
This 4-megapixel camera is lightweight and fits into a small, inexpensive padded case with
a belt loop. I wore it on my pack's waist belt; I kept it in front so it
was handy
to use. The camera survived several dunkings on
Day 141, safe in
a little plastic sandwich
bag!
This camera is no longer made but similar Coolpix cameras are available in
stores and on-line. Ours was reasonably priced at $179.00 at Sam's Club.
Although I didn't have time to learn how to use all the functions properly
before beginning the trek, I got enough good photos to earn the praise of
several readers.
I also used Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0 software to organize and tweak the
pictures. I've learned even fewer of the capabilities of this excellent
software, just enough to do a bit of editing like cropping and lightening dark
photos.
When I have more time in the coming weeks I will prepare photos for the
"more photos" link above; I only had time to do training photos. Once we were on the
road and Trail it was tough to get the journaling done every night, let alone edit
all the photos.
CELL PHONE
All last winter and spring Jim and I debated and researched what communication devices to use on the Trail.
Several kinds of two-way radios didn't work well on trails locally so we returned them
all. Satellite phones were too costly. We finally decided to try using just our cell
phones. We have service with Verizon because that company had the most coverage
nationally when we got the phones in December, 2003.
Lo and behold, the cell phones worked pretty well!
Even though Verizon
sometimes drives us crazy (e.g., have you ever seen their billing statements??),
what I heard from other thru-hikers with phones indicated that those with
Verizon service seemed to do better than those using other companies.
I'd often have five bars
(great service) on mountain tops. Jim's service was less reliable down in the
valleys where he usually was located, but the majority of the time we were able to
contact one another when it really mattered. The least coverage we had was in
northern New England (Vermont, New Hampshire, and especially Maine).
Our emergency contact was my sister in Philadelphia. If Jim and I couldn't
reach each other and it was very important we talk, the plan was to call Nancy.
If our cell phone(s) didn't work, we were to use a pay phone to call her.
She'd try to contact the other person and relay the message. We did this
only once, fairly early on.
MARMOT PRECIP RAIN GEAR
Most days I carried at least my Marmot Precip jacket, if not my pants.
Even in the summer mountain weather is unpredictable. I learned that the hard
way once when I had to wait for Jim about an hour in a thunderstorm and I didn't
have my jacket. I was pretty cold by the time he got there, and had to pace back
and forth to keep warm. It was in the middle of summer in one of the
mid-Atlantic states without real mountains.
I seldom wore the jacket, even on 50-degree mornings. I was usually warm
enough if I kept running or hiking. If I put it on first thing, I'd usually have
to remove it in a few minutes because I'd heat up fast - I almost always had a hill to climb right out of
the truck (starting at roads usually meant starting at a low point each day).
But when I needed it, I really needed it - like the first chilly rainy day in
Georgia, or on Mt. Madison in the sleet and high wind. I kept the jacket in a
gallon-size plastic bag to keep it dry if the pack and contents got wet.
I didn't carry my Precip pants (or gloves or fleece hat) nearly as often. I
had them with me in the spring in the first four states, where the elevations
were higher and weather more unpredictable, and in the last two states as the
weather got cooler in the fall and the mountains were higher again.
The Precip jacket and pants keep the rain and wind out but I really sweat inside
them. I managed to not rip either one on rocks. On a few cooler days when I
thought I'd have to slide down rock slabs in NH and ME, I wore less expensive REI zip-leg
pants instead of the $99.00 Precip pants.
LIGHTS
Lighting systems are always a topic of interest to ultra runners. Jim and I
have quite a collection.
For this trek, I relied on three lights but needed them only three times when
I started or finished in the dark.
Every day I carried a tiny (size of a quarter) Photon micro-light in one of
my front packs. It was my emergency back-up. I never used it. It got wet a few
times before I realized I should keep it in a plastic bag, but it still works.
You can get these now for less than $10.00 and they light up the trail amazingly
well. I even used one for the first hour at VT100 in July.
In NH and ME, I also carried a Streamlight hand-held 7-LED flashlight most
days, just in case I was out after dark. I kept it in a plastic bag to keep it
dry.
I used a Photon Fusion 6-LED headlamp only on
Day 125 in the Wildcat-Carter-Moriah
Mountain Range in New Hampshire because I knew I'd be finishing after dark. I
wear the strap around my waist instead of my head because it doesn't
bounce as much and it casts more light on the Trail since it's closer to the
ground. I used the headlamp in
combination with the Streamlight flashlight that day.
The Streamlight was brighter, so from then on I carried the Streamlight and
not the Fusion. It was fine by itself the ninety minutes Jim and I were out
after dark on
Day 127 on rough trail coming off Old Speck.
OTHER ITEMS?
If you have questions about other gear I used, or wonder why I didn't use
such-and-such, please let me know and I'll address it.